Property insurers tighten coverage as climate change continues

Climate-driven events are prompting changes in US commercial property insurance policy wordings and tighter terms and conditions, as insurers try to manage an increase in the frequency and severity of natural catastrophe losses, brokers say. How policies define change in temperature and how deductibles and limits are applied are some of the areas where commercial property policyholders are seeing changes, they explain. Global insured natural catastrophe losses totalled $40bn in the first half of 2021, according to a report published last week by Swiss Re Institute. Winter storm Uri, which hit swaths of the US in February, caused estimated insured losses of $15bn, the highest ever recorded for this peril in the US. Uri accounted for about 38% of all estimated global insured losses from natural catastrophes in the first half of the year, Swiss Re said. Weather-related events – not just one-off events – are becoming more frequent and severe, and there’s a push by insurers to continue to clarify and enforce language, said Martha Bane, managing director of the North America property practice at A J Gallagher. For hail/convective storm losses, insurers have pushed actual cash value on building roofs in the past two to three years, Ms Bane said. “That means a much lower claim payout for the insured,” she said. Insurers have also introduced “very scientific ways” of detecting pre-existing damage, she added. As first reported in Business Insurance, deductibles in commercial property policies have changed significantly. It’s almost standard in hail-prone areas for policies now to have a percent deductible for the exposure, “whereas in the past the standard all-other-perils deductible applied”, said Ms Bane. In the wake of winter storm Uri, which knocked out power for numerous people and companies in Texas, change in temperature language has also been added to policies to clarify what coverage insurers intend to provide, she continued. Insurers are moving to refine and restrict coverage following the freeze event in February, said Brian Dove, USI Insurance Services US national real estate practice leader. “There are going to be some changes in policy language as it relates to that type of event, because the application of some of the carrier forms is not what clients expected, so there were some shortfalls there,” Mr Dove said. One of the questions is around the term “change in temperature”, he said. “We haven’t seen the final version of where we’ll land but there will be changes in the policy language as it relates to that type of event,” said Mr Dove. Deductibles for earthquake, flood, named storm and wind/hail have also changed, increasing retentions for policyholders, he said. And insurers have reduced capacity for wildfire risks, he added. Joseph Jonas, product manager, commercial lines, at the American Association of Insurance Services, an insurance statistics and advisory organisation, said there is not necessarily a shift by insurers to standardise language for extreme weather events and climate change. But recent events have led to a shift in how the industry approaches extreme weather events, whether that’s insurers developing new coverages, the way insurance departments look at new filings, catastrophe modelling or adjudication of claims, he said. Superstorm Sandy in 2012 brought to light inadequacies in policy language and/or policy offerings, for example, Mr Jonas continued. Insurers are requesting a lot more information from catastrophe modellers with respect to climate change, in part because external stakeholders, such as regulators and ratings agencies, are seeking more information from insurers, said Karen Clark, president and CEO of Karen Clark & Co. “Insurers want to make sure the cat models are accounting for climate change to the extent possible,” she said. In California, regulators are paying closer attention to climate change when it comes to wildfire hazard, for example. They want to “understand the models better and how they are capturing this information”, Ms Clark explained. Regulators want to be sure that mitigation steps taken by property owners and communities, such as pruning and clearing brush, are incorporated into the models and reflected in the rates charged, she said. Wildfire is the modelled peril that has the highest percentage impact from climate change, followed by floods and hurricanes, and then severe convective storms, Ms Clark said. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says in its latest report, published earlier this month, that “it is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land”. The report warns that temperatures are likely to rise by more than 1.5°C during the next 20 years, bringing widespread extreme weather. For further news from Business Insurance, please click here.

Property insurers tighten coverage as climate change continues

Want to read this article?

Read Next

Marsh tracks slowdown in global Q1 rate hikes

Markel names head of terrorism in London

Insurers defend Nord Stream’s €400m lawsuit as act of war

Allstate posts nat cat loss of $343m for March

UAE flash flood losses manageable as insurers adapt to changing weather

Marsh tracks slowdown in global Q1 rate hikes

Markel names head of terrorism in London

Insurers defend Nord Stream’s €400m lawsuit as act of war

Allstate posts nat cat loss of $343m for March

UAE flash flood losses manageable as insurers adapt to changing weather

Want to read this article?

Read Next

Marsh tracks slowdown in global Q1 rate hikes

Markel names head of terrorism in London

Insurers defend Nord Stream’s €400m lawsuit as act of war

Allstate posts nat cat loss of $343m for March

UAE flash flood losses manageable as insurers adapt to changing weather

Related Articles